https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365809 The CESTAT upheld the Order-in-Original, confirming the appellant's liability for service tax on Rent-a-Cab Operator services, non-payment of collected tax, and penalties imposed under the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant's arguments regarding client reimbursement, intention to evade tax, and applicability of service tax on services to other operators were rejected, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and affirming the penalties imposed by the Joint Commissioner. en-us Mon, 16 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Nov 2019 17:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365809 The CESTAT upheld the Order-in-Original, confirming the appellant's liability for service tax on Rent-a-Cab Operator services, non-payment of collected tax, and penalties imposed under the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant's arguments regarding client reimbursement, intention to evade tax, and applicability of service tax on services to other operators were rejected, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and affirming the penalties imposed by the Joint Commissioner. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 16 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365809