<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 13 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14183</link>
    <description>Weighted deduction for export-related expenditure was confined to costs directly qualifying under section 35B: the fee paid to the Export Promotion Council qualified because it related to export market development information, but salary for export staff, post-shipment interest, bank charges and commission were treated as India-incurred expenditure and excluded. The note also states that a new ground may be raised in appeal with leave where the necessary facts are already on record; on the facts discussed, the additional ground concerning interest paid to the bank on export bill discounting was permitted to be raised, but the deduction claim itself was rejected on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:43:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 13 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14183</link>
      <description>Weighted deduction for export-related expenditure was confined to costs directly qualifying under section 35B: the fee paid to the Export Promotion Council qualified because it related to export market development information, but salary for export staff, post-shipment interest, bank charges and commission were treated as India-incurred expenditure and excluded. The note also states that a new ground may be raised in appeal with leave where the necessary facts are already on record; on the facts discussed, the additional ground concerning interest paid to the bank on export bill discounting was permitted to be raised, but the deduction claim itself was rejected on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>