<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 353 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274591</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court of India held that the writ petition was not the appropriate avenue and directed the petitioner to seek remedy through the normal statutory process. The petitioner can present arguments before the CIT (A) for decision without interference from the High Court. The special leave petition was disposed of, leaving all contentions open for both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 18:23:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 353 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274591</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court of India held that the writ petition was not the appropriate avenue and directed the petitioner to seek remedy through the normal statutory process. The petitioner can present arguments before the CIT (A) for decision without interference from the High Court. The special leave petition was disposed of, leaving all contentions open for both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>