https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274589 The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. It ruled that the provision ensuring precedence of trial under the Act does not violate the right to a speedy and fair trial under Article 21. The Court also found no violation of Articles 14, 22(4), and 300A, dismissing the argument that the Act discriminates against accused individuals. Additionally, the Court rejected the request to quash the First Information Report dated 2.5.2010. en-us Fri, 02 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Aug 2018 16:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274589 The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. It ruled that the provision ensuring precedence of trial under the Act does not violate the right to a speedy and fair trial under Article 21. The Court also found no violation of Articles 14, 22(4), and 300A, dismissing the argument that the Act discriminates against accused individuals. Additionally, the Court rejected the request to quash the First Information Report dated 2.5.2010. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274589