<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1550 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGLORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274587</link>
    <description>Concerns raised in a public interest petition about recovery of customs duty during Aero India 2011 were met by an oral assurance from the Commissioner of Customs that adequate staff had been posted to ensure recovery of duty as due under the Customs Act and relevant notifications. The High Court accepted that administrative assurance, found that the specific grievance had been addressed, and disposed of the petition on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 14:23:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1550 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGLORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274587</link>
      <description>Concerns raised in a public interest petition about recovery of customs duty during Aero India 2011 were met by an oral assurance from the Commissioner of Customs that adequate staff had been posted to ensure recovery of duty as due under the Customs Act and relevant notifications. The High Court accepted that administrative assurance, found that the specific grievance had been addressed, and disposed of the petition on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>