<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1260 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365788</link>
    <description>The Tribunal revised its decision in favor of the assessee, treating the loss incurred on Future &amp;amp; Option (F&amp;amp;O) transactions as a normal business loss eligible for set-off against other business income. The Tribunal acknowledged overlooking a favorable judgment from the Calcutta High Court, which held that such losses should not be categorized as speculative. Consequently, the interest charges under sections 234B and 234C of the Income Tax Act may need to be recalculated in line with this revised decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 09:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1260 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365788</link>
      <description>The Tribunal revised its decision in favor of the assessee, treating the loss incurred on Future &amp;amp; Option (F&amp;amp;O) transactions as a normal business loss eligible for set-off against other business income. The Tribunal acknowledged overlooking a favorable judgment from the Calcutta High Court, which held that such losses should not be categorized as speculative. Consequently, the interest charges under sections 234B and 234C of the Income Tax Act may need to be recalculated in line with this revised decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>