<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1242 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365770</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; findings that the appellant&#039;s unauthorized transfer of machinery from EOU to DTA without permission was incorrect. Consequently, the penalties imposed were deemed appropriate. The tribunal concluded that the impugned order was legally sound and warranted no interference, leading to the rejection of the appeals from both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 12:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1242 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365770</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; findings that the appellant&#039;s unauthorized transfer of machinery from EOU to DTA without permission was incorrect. Consequently, the penalties imposed were deemed appropriate. The tribunal concluded that the impugned order was legally sound and warranted no interference, leading to the rejection of the appeals from both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>