https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365759 The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned order demanding service tax on educational programs, and remanded the case for fresh adjudication by the Principal Commissioner of Service Tax within 3 months. The court emphasized the importance of procedural fairness, highlighting the significant delay of 8 years in the adjudication process and the need for a reasonable opportunity for the petitioner to present their case. All contentions were kept open except for the delay issue raised in the show cause notice. en-us Wed, 30 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Aug 2018 09:35:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365759 The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned order demanding service tax on educational programs, and remanded the case for fresh adjudication by the Principal Commissioner of Service Tax within 3 months. The court emphasized the importance of procedural fairness, highlighting the significant delay of 8 years in the adjudication process and the need for a reasonable opportunity for the petitioner to present their case. All contentions were kept open except for the delay issue raised in the show cause notice. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 30 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365759