<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1222 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365750</link>
    <description>The appeal by M/s. Karnataka Vikas Grameena Bank regarding the demand for service tax on reimbursed stamp charges was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore. The Tribunal considered legal precedents and determined that the reimbursed stamp charges were not subject to service tax, following the clarification provided by the Supreme Court in a relevant case. The decision was in favor of the appellants, granting them consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 09:34:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1222 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365750</link>
      <description>The appeal by M/s. Karnataka Vikas Grameena Bank regarding the demand for service tax on reimbursed stamp charges was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore. The Tribunal considered legal precedents and determined that the reimbursed stamp charges were not subject to service tax, following the clarification provided by the Supreme Court in a relevant case. The decision was in favor of the appellants, granting them consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>