<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1220 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365748</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, emphasizing the appellants&#039; liability under Business Exhibition Service and the need for quantification of tax payable. The decision highlighted the importance of adhering to Board circulars in determining tax liabilities and penalties in cases involving statutory interpretation. Penalties were set aside due to the interpretation of statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 09:34:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1220 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365748</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, emphasizing the appellants&#039; liability under Business Exhibition Service and the need for quantification of tax payable. The decision highlighted the importance of adhering to Board circulars in determining tax liabilities and penalties in cases involving statutory interpretation. Penalties were set aside due to the interpretation of statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>