<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1217 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365745</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty under Sec.11AC and confirming the demand for duty while directing the set off against the excess duty paid. The appellant, a partnership firm, had paid duty in excess during the relevant period, leading to the conclusion that no penalty should be imposed as the net effect of the assessment showed an overall excess payment of duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 09:34:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1217 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365745</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty under Sec.11AC and confirming the demand for duty while directing the set off against the excess duty paid. The appellant, a partnership firm, had paid duty in excess during the relevant period, leading to the conclusion that no penalty should be imposed as the net effect of the assessment showed an overall excess payment of duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>