https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365743 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for differential duty under Sec.4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The decision was based on the finding that the goods in question had various applications beyond automobiles, contrary to the authorities' contention. The Tribunal held that the demands exceeded the scope of the show cause notice, which did not establish that the products were solely used in automobiles. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with consequential relief, emphasizing the goods' diverse usage and dismissing the differential duty demands. en-us Mon, 06 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Aug 2018 09:34:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365743 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for differential duty under Sec.4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The decision was based on the finding that the goods in question had various applications beyond automobiles, contrary to the authorities' contention. The Tribunal held that the demands exceeded the scope of the show cause notice, which did not establish that the products were solely used in automobiles. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with consequential relief, emphasizing the goods' diverse usage and dismissing the differential duty demands. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 06 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365743