https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365742 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing their refund claims based on price reduction post-clearance. The decision emphasized the application of changed valuation rules post-2000 and the entitlement to refunds within Sec.11B time limits. The impugned Order-in-Appeal was set aside, granting consequential relief to the appellant, a manufacturer of concrete railway sleepers, in a dispute with the department over duty liability and price fluctuations under the agreement with Indian Railways. en-us Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Aug 2018 09:34:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365742 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing their refund claims based on price reduction post-clearance. The decision emphasized the application of changed valuation rules post-2000 and the entitlement to refunds within Sec.11B time limits. The impugned Order-in-Appeal was set aside, granting consequential relief to the appellant, a manufacturer of concrete railway sleepers, in a dispute with the department over duty liability and price fluctuations under the agreement with Indian Railways. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365742