<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1211 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365739</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the rectification of a mistake in the Final Order regarding CENVAT credit, where the word &quot;not&quot; was inserted in para 82 to accurately reflect the conclusion. The appellant&#039;s plea concerning the non-supply of raw materials despite duty payment was deemed sustainable, and the correction was necessary. The rectification was pronounced in open Court on 04/07/2018, granting the appellant the CENVAT credit on raw material as per the corrected order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 09:34:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1211 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365739</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the rectification of a mistake in the Final Order regarding CENVAT credit, where the word &quot;not&quot; was inserted in para 82 to accurately reflect the conclusion. The appellant&#039;s plea concerning the non-supply of raw materials despite duty payment was deemed sustainable, and the correction was necessary. The rectification was pronounced in open Court on 04/07/2018, granting the appellant the CENVAT credit on raw material as per the corrected order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>