<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 29 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14169</link>
    <description>Kist payable by an excise contractor to the Government was held not to have the character of duty or tax, so the unpaid amount outstanding at the end of the accounting year did not fall within section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The provision applies only to specified statutory liabilities, and the described kist was outside its scope. The reference was therefore answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:04:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 29 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14169</link>
      <description>Kist payable by an excise contractor to the Government was held not to have the character of duty or tax, so the unpaid amount outstanding at the end of the accounting year did not fall within section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The provision applies only to specified statutory liabilities, and the described kist was outside its scope. The reference was therefore answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>