<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 11 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14165</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 1988-89. The court held that the petitioner&#039;s arguments for quashing the notice were premature as no return had been filed in response to the notice, and no prejudicial order had been passed. The court emphasized that the decision in a criminal case not to frame charges against the petitioner did not impact tax liability under the Income-tax Act. The petitioner was allowed to file a return and raise objections against the proceedings, with the court clarifying that its observations would not adversely affect the petitioner&#039;s case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:55:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 11 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14165</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 1988-89. The court held that the petitioner&#039;s arguments for quashing the notice were premature as no return had been filed in response to the notice, and no prejudicial order had been passed. The court emphasized that the decision in a criminal case not to frame charges against the petitioner did not impact tax liability under the Income-tax Act. The petitioner was allowed to file a return and raise objections against the proceedings, with the court clarifying that its observations would not adversely affect the petitioner&#039;s case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>