https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365724 The Appellate Tribunal, ITAT Hyderabad, ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that no international transaction existed during the relevant financial year regarding the adjustment of profit under the profit Split Method. However, the Tribunal did not address the MAT credit eligibility, foreign tax credit eligibility, and the levying of interest under sections 234B and 234C, as the assessee chose not to pursue these grounds during the hearing. en-us Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Aug 2018 08:06:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365724 The Appellate Tribunal, ITAT Hyderabad, ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that no international transaction existed during the relevant financial year regarding the adjustment of profit under the profit Split Method. However, the Tribunal did not address the MAT credit eligibility, foreign tax credit eligibility, and the levying of interest under sections 234B and 234C, as the assessee chose not to pursue these grounds during the hearing. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365724