<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1186 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365714</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the set off of business loss against income of capital gains was justified under the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appellant successfully argued that the gain from the sale of the business asset should be considered as business income, allowing for the set off of carried forward business losses. The Tribunal referred to precedent supporting this interpretation and directed the Assessing Officer to grant the set off of business loss against the capital gains.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2018 08:05:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1186 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365714</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the set off of business loss against income of capital gains was justified under the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appellant successfully argued that the gain from the sale of the business asset should be considered as business income, allowing for the set off of carried forward business losses. The Tribunal referred to precedent supporting this interpretation and directed the Assessing Officer to grant the set off of business loss against the capital gains.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>