<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1181 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365709</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the reopening of assessments based on concrete information indicating the assessee&#039;s involvement in bogus purchases. However, the Tribunal found that the additions towards bogus purchases were not justified as the assessee provided ample evidence to prove the transactions&#039; genuineness. The appeals of the assessee were partly allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2018 08:05:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1181 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365709</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the reopening of assessments based on concrete information indicating the assessee&#039;s involvement in bogus purchases. However, the Tribunal found that the additions towards bogus purchases were not justified as the assessee provided ample evidence to prove the transactions&#039; genuineness. The appeals of the assessee were partly allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>