https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365702 The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Commissioner's decision to demand service tax, interest, and penalties. The Tribunal determined that the agreements constituted renting of immovable property, making them liable for service tax. The extended period of limitation was justified due to suppression of facts by the appellants. Penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 were upheld for various violations. en-us Thu, 09 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Jan 2019 16:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365702 The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Commissioner's decision to demand service tax, interest, and penalties. The Tribunal determined that the agreements constituted renting of immovable property, making them liable for service tax. The extended period of limitation was justified due to suppression of facts by the appellants. Penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 were upheld for various violations. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 09 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365702