https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365701 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand of service tax, interest, and penalties imposed under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The decision was based on the appellant's compliance with the Reverse Charge Mechanism, highlighting procedural lapses without revenue loss to the government. Judicial precedents, including a Supreme Court decision, supported the appellant's position. The Tribunal concluded that the demand in the Adjudication Order could not be sustained, leading to the appeal being allowed in favor of the appellant. en-us Mon, 06 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Aug 2018 08:05:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365701 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand of service tax, interest, and penalties imposed under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The decision was based on the appellant's compliance with the Reverse Charge Mechanism, highlighting procedural lapses without revenue loss to the government. Judicial precedents, including a Supreme Court decision, supported the appellant's position. The Tribunal concluded that the demand in the Adjudication Order could not be sustained, leading to the appeal being allowed in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 06 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365701