https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365698 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD allowed the appeal by the appellant-assessee concerning the validity of claiming Cenvat credit based on the Bill of Entry endorsement under Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal held that the appellant had met the requirements of Rule 9(2) as the goods were duty paid and used for business purposes, even though the Bill of Entry lacked endorsement by the Customs office. Therefore, the appellant was deemed entitled to avail Cenvat credit, and the Miscellaneous Application for Early Hearing was disposed of accordingly. en-us Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Sep 2018 12:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365698 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD allowed the appeal by the appellant-assessee concerning the validity of claiming Cenvat credit based on the Bill of Entry endorsement under Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal held that the appellant had met the requirements of Rule 9(2) as the goods were duty paid and used for business purposes, even though the Bill of Entry lacked endorsement by the Customs office. Therefore, the appellant was deemed entitled to avail Cenvat credit, and the Miscellaneous Application for Early Hearing was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365698