<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1167 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365695</link>
    <description>The tribunal clarified that acid oil is exigible to excise duty as an intended final product, while soap sludge is waste and not excisable. It reworked duty liability based on this classification, setting aside the penalty under Section 11AC due to the confusion and ongoing litigation. The matter was remanded for reworking duty liability, with interest payable on the reworked amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2020 11:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1167 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365695</link>
      <description>The tribunal clarified that acid oil is exigible to excise duty as an intended final product, while soap sludge is waste and not excisable. It reworked duty liability based on this classification, setting aside the penalty under Section 11AC due to the confusion and ongoing litigation. The matter was remanded for reworking duty liability, with interest payable on the reworked amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>