<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 74 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14153</link>
    <description>Cash credits recorded in books seized during a search raised the issue whether the statutory presumption under s.132(4A) precluded an addition under s.68. The HC held that s.132(4A) creates a rebuttable presumption limited to search-and-seizure proceedings and provisional adjudication under s.132(5), and does not override the general rule in s.68 applicable in regular assessment requiring the assessee to satisfactorily explain the nature and source of credits; consequently, the addition under s.68 could be sustained and the Tribunal&#039;s view on non-applicability of s.132(4A) was upheld in favour of the Revenue. A further question turning on factual appreciation was declined as it was essentially a question of fact.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 20:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 74 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14153</link>
      <description>Cash credits recorded in books seized during a search raised the issue whether the statutory presumption under s.132(4A) precluded an addition under s.68. The HC held that s.132(4A) creates a rebuttable presumption limited to search-and-seizure proceedings and provisional adjudication under s.132(5), and does not override the general rule in s.68 applicable in regular assessment requiring the assessee to satisfactorily explain the nature and source of credits; consequently, the addition under s.68 could be sustained and the Tribunal&#039;s view on non-applicability of s.132(4A) was upheld in favour of the Revenue. A further question turning on factual appreciation was declined as it was essentially a question of fact.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>