https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365671 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to accept certain sources of funds for construction and recompute the investments. The Tribunal allowed deductions for rate variation and self-supervision in the cost of construction. It accepted funds from agricultural and business income as legitimate sources but rejected wages payable due to lack of evidence. The appeal was dismissed regarding the enhancement of sources for construction and the addition of agricultural income belonging to the wife of the assessee, as the assessee did not pursue these grounds effectively. en-us Tue, 31 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Aug 2018 08:06:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365671 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to accept certain sources of funds for construction and recompute the investments. The Tribunal allowed deductions for rate variation and self-supervision in the cost of construction. It accepted funds from agricultural and business income as legitimate sources but rejected wages payable due to lack of evidence. The appeal was dismissed regarding the enhancement of sources for construction and the addition of agricultural income belonging to the wife of the assessee, as the assessee did not pursue these grounds effectively. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 31 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365671