<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1142 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365670</link>
    <description>Where GST transit detention occurs, provisional release must follow the statutory mechanism requiring a bond for the value of the goods and security for tax and penalty, and the Court cannot replace those conditions with a more lenient arrangement on equitable grounds. The prescribed bond and bank guarantee requirements were treated as mandatory, and the detained goods were directed to be released only on compliance with those conditions. The trader was left to pursue the appellate remedy against the demand order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 18:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1142 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365670</link>
      <description>Where GST transit detention occurs, provisional release must follow the statutory mechanism requiring a bond for the value of the goods and security for tax and penalty, and the Court cannot replace those conditions with a more lenient arrangement on equitable grounds. The prescribed bond and bank guarantee requirements were treated as mandatory, and the detained goods were directed to be released only on compliance with those conditions. The trader was left to pursue the appellate remedy against the demand order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>