<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1133 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365661</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with certain issues remanded back to the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) and Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) for reconsideration. The Tribunal directed the exclusion of Suven Life Sciences from the list of comparables, emphasizing the importance of detailed consideration and appropriate adjustments in determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) and related computations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 08:01:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1133 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365661</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with certain issues remanded back to the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) and Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) for reconsideration. The Tribunal directed the exclusion of Suven Life Sciences from the list of comparables, emphasizing the importance of detailed consideration and appropriate adjustments in determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) and related computations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365661</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>