https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365651 Additional composition fee demanded for extending time to fulfil export obligation was found unsustainable where the petitioner had already paid the fee and the extension application had remained pending. The Court held that the respondent could not, after acting on the earlier extension order, impose a fresh and substantially enhanced demand by recomputing the fee, as the impugned demand was without jurisdiction and illegal. The respondent was bound to give effect to the payments already made without insisting on any further amount. Extension of time was directed prospectively from the date of the fresh order for six months. en-us Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Aug 2018 07:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365651 Additional composition fee demanded for extending time to fulfil export obligation was found unsustainable where the petitioner had already paid the fee and the extension application had remained pending. The Court held that the respondent could not, after acting on the earlier extension order, impose a fresh and substantially enhanced demand by recomputing the fee, as the impugned demand was without jurisdiction and illegal. The respondent was bound to give effect to the payments already made without insisting on any further amount. Extension of time was directed prospectively from the date of the fresh order for six months. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365651