https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365649 The tribunal found in favor of the appellant, ruling that the decision to disentitle them from the benefits of a customs notification was incorrect. The appellant's compliance with eligibility requirements at the time of import, despite alleged post-importation failures, rendered the confiscation and duty recovery actions unauthorized. The tribunal determined that the appellant had fulfilled the necessary conditions, including providing free treatment to patients, and allowed the appeal on 14/08/2018, concluding that the confiscation of goods, penalty imposition, and duty recovery lacked legal basis. en-us Tue, 14 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Nov 2020 13:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365649 The tribunal found in favor of the appellant, ruling that the decision to disentitle them from the benefits of a customs notification was incorrect. The appellant's compliance with eligibility requirements at the time of import, despite alleged post-importation failures, rendered the confiscation and duty recovery actions unauthorized. The tribunal determined that the appellant had fulfilled the necessary conditions, including providing free treatment to patients, and allowed the appeal on 14/08/2018, concluding that the confiscation of goods, penalty imposition, and duty recovery lacked legal basis. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 14 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365649