<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1119 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365647</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding they had no knowledge of exporting prohibited goods and cooperated with authorities. Penalties under Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 were set aside due to lack of evidence of their involvement, granting them relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 07:46:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1119 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365647</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding they had no knowledge of exporting prohibited goods and cooperated with authorities. Penalties under Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 were set aside due to lack of evidence of their involvement, granting them relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>