<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1081 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365609</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration. The appellant, a Rolling mill, claimed exemption under notification No. 202/88-CE for goods produced from scrap, disputing the department&#039;s contention that purchasing scrap from a ship breaking unit rendered the final product ineligible for exemption. The Tribunal found that the invoices indicated purchases from various scrap traders, not solely from the ship breaking unit as alleged. Emphasizing the importance of verifying the source of purchased scrap, the Tribunal directed a fresh assessment based on the appellant&#039;s submissions and relevant legal precedents to ensure accurate determination of duty payment status.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 06:41:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1081 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365609</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration. The appellant, a Rolling mill, claimed exemption under notification No. 202/88-CE for goods produced from scrap, disputing the department&#039;s contention that purchasing scrap from a ship breaking unit rendered the final product ineligible for exemption. The Tribunal found that the invoices indicated purchases from various scrap traders, not solely from the ship breaking unit as alleged. Emphasizing the importance of verifying the source of purchased scrap, the Tribunal directed a fresh assessment based on the appellant&#039;s submissions and relevant legal precedents to ensure accurate determination of duty payment status.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>