<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 73 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14144</link>
    <description>A disputed computation of liability under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme required a reasoned determination by the designated authority. The HC held that the assessee was entitled to know the basis of the department&#039;s figure and to challenge it if arbitrary or inconsistent with the Scheme, but the court would not itself undertake the factual exercise of calculating the actual tax payable. The impugned determination was set aside and the matter remanded to the designated authority for fresh decision on the basis of the relevant records and pending proceedings, after giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing and passing a reasoned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:47:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 73 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14144</link>
      <description>A disputed computation of liability under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme required a reasoned determination by the designated authority. The HC held that the assessee was entitled to know the basis of the department&#039;s figure and to challenge it if arbitrary or inconsistent with the Scheme, but the court would not itself undertake the factual exercise of calculating the actual tax payable. The impugned determination was set aside and the matter remanded to the designated authority for fresh decision on the basis of the relevant records and pending proceedings, after giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing and passing a reasoned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>