https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365604 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the partnership firm facing charges of clandestine removal and duty confirmation, as the counsel did not press for it. However, in the case of the partner, the Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed, citing a High Court precedent that a separate penalty on the partner was not justified if the partnership firm had already been penalized. This decision emphasizes the significance of legal precedents and High Court rulings in determining the liability of partners in scenarios where penalties have been imposed on the firms. en-us Tue, 12 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Aug 2018 06:38:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365604 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the partnership firm facing charges of clandestine removal and duty confirmation, as the counsel did not press for it. However, in the case of the partner, the Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed, citing a High Court precedent that a separate penalty on the partner was not justified if the partnership firm had already been penalized. This decision emphasizes the significance of legal precedents and High Court rulings in determining the liability of partners in scenarios where penalties have been imposed on the firms. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 12 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365604