https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14136 The court upheld the legality of the search conducted under section 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on the petitioner's premises, despite challenges regarding authorization and clerical errors. Additionally, the court deemed the appointment of a chartered accountant firm to audit seized material and the company's accounts under section 142(2A) of the Act as lawful. The petitioner's claims of illegality were dismissed, and the court rejected the writ petition challenging the search and subsequent order. en-us Mon, 11 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:31:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14136 The court upheld the legality of the search conducted under section 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on the petitioner's premises, despite challenges regarding authorization and clerical errors. Additionally, the court deemed the appointment of a chartered accountant firm to audit seized material and the company's accounts under section 142(2A) of the Act as lawful. The petitioner's claims of illegality were dismissed, and the court rejected the writ petition challenging the search and subsequent order. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 11 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14136