<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 45 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14135</link>
    <description>Deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) is confined to income directly attributable to banking activity properly so called. Interest from deposits made out of statutory reserve funds under section 67(2) of the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act was held not deductible because deployment of surplus reserve funds is not, by itself, banking activity. Interest from deposits made out of voluntary reserves was also treated as investment income lacking the required proximate nexus with banking operations and was likewise not deductible. Locker rent was considered income from a separate safe deposit vault activity, not core banking income, and was not deductible under the provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:19:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 45 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14135</link>
      <description>Deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) is confined to income directly attributable to banking activity properly so called. Interest from deposits made out of statutory reserve funds under section 67(2) of the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act was held not deductible because deployment of surplus reserve funds is not, by itself, banking activity. Interest from deposits made out of voluntary reserves was also treated as investment income lacking the required proximate nexus with banking operations and was likewise not deductible. Locker rent was considered income from a separate safe deposit vault activity, not core banking income, and was not deductible under the provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>