<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 66 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14132</link>
    <description>The High Court held that only income directly related to specified warehousing activities is exempt under section 10(29) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court referred to Supreme Court precedent to clarify that ancillary income is taxable. The High Court ruled against the corporation, advising the Tribunal to determine income division and expense allocation based on legal principles and precedents. The judgment favored the Revenue, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:10:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 66 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14132</link>
      <description>The High Court held that only income directly related to specified warehousing activities is exempt under section 10(29) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court referred to Supreme Court precedent to clarify that ancillary income is taxable. The High Court ruled against the corporation, advising the Tribunal to determine income division and expense allocation based on legal principles and precedents. The judgment favored the Revenue, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>