<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules on Tax Deductions: Profit Apportionment Not Equivalent to Bad Debt Provision Under Income Tax Act Sections 36(1)(viia) &amp; (viii.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=40940</link>
    <description>Deduction u/s 36(1)(viia) or u/s 36(1)(viii) - creation of special reserve fund - the assessee has tried to equate the apportionment of profit against an expenditure for provision for bad and doubtful debts which in our view is not possible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2018 08:09:42 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2018 08:09:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531307" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules on Tax Deductions: Profit Apportionment Not Equivalent to Bad Debt Provision Under Income Tax Act Sections 36(1)(viia) &amp; (viii.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=40940</link>
      <description>Deduction u/s 36(1)(viia) or u/s 36(1)(viii) - creation of special reserve fund - the assessee has tried to equate the apportionment of profit against an expenditure for provision for bad and doubtful debts which in our view is not possible.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2018 08:09:42 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=40940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>