https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365559 The Tribunal quashed the interim order by the NCLT, directing the 2nd respondent to continue as a director and staying the appointment of the 3rd respondent. All decisions made post 12.10.2017 were set aside. An independent director was to be appointed to ensure compliance and mediate disputes, with a casting vote in case of disagreements. The issues of disqualification and the legality of the 3rd respondent's appointment remained pending for further determination. en-us Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Aug 2018 07:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365559 The Tribunal quashed the interim order by the NCLT, directing the 2nd respondent to continue as a director and staying the appointment of the 3rd respondent. All decisions made post 12.10.2017 were set aside. An independent director was to be appointed to ensure compliance and mediate disputes, with a casting vote in case of disagreements. The issues of disqualification and the legality of the 3rd respondent's appointment remained pending for further determination. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365559