https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365540 The appellant had been directed to deposit 7.5% of the confirmed demand within six weeks under the amended pre-deposit regime in Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. No compliance report was filed and the appellant did not appear when the matter was taken up. The Tribunal therefore treated the default as non-compliance with both the stay order and the statutory pre-deposit requirement and dismissed the appeal. en-us Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Aug 2018 06:50:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365540 The appellant had been directed to deposit 7.5% of the confirmed demand within six weeks under the amended pre-deposit regime in Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. No compliance report was filed and the appellant did not appear when the matter was taken up. The Tribunal therefore treated the default as non-compliance with both the stay order and the statutory pre-deposit requirement and dismissed the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365540