<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1005 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365533</link>
    <description>An adjudicating authority cannot deny CENVAT credit on grounds not set out in the show cause notice, and any new objections introduced for the first time in the order are beyond scope. Where credit eligibility depends on verification of import, storage, and distribution records, denial is not justified without complete factual examination by the jurisdictional authority, and registration before availment is treated as procedural rather than a substantive bar. The document also notes that, where audit had already identified the issue and duty with interest was paid without fraud, suppression, collusion, or wilful misstatement being established, the matter falls within Section 11A(2B) and penalties are not sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2018 06:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1005 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365533</link>
      <description>An adjudicating authority cannot deny CENVAT credit on grounds not set out in the show cause notice, and any new objections introduced for the first time in the order are beyond scope. Where credit eligibility depends on verification of import, storage, and distribution records, denial is not justified without complete factual examination by the jurisdictional authority, and registration before availment is treated as procedural rather than a substantive bar. The document also notes that, where audit had already identified the issue and duty with interest was paid without fraud, suppression, collusion, or wilful misstatement being established, the matter falls within Section 11A(2B) and penalties are not sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>