<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1717 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274524</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order denying Cenvat credit on items used for support structures for machinery. Relying on past decisions, including a Madras High Court case and a Tribunal decision, it determined that the appellant correctly availed the credit. The decision underscores the importance of precedent and consistency in interpreting tax laws, emphasizing the relevance of legal principles in resolving tax disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2018 14:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1717 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274524</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order denying Cenvat credit on items used for support structures for machinery. Relying on past decisions, including a Madras High Court case and a Tribunal decision, it determined that the appellant correctly availed the credit. The decision underscores the importance of precedent and consistency in interpreting tax laws, emphasizing the relevance of legal principles in resolving tax disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>