<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1548 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274508</link>
    <description>An income tax appeal was not entertained because the tax effect was below the CBDT monetary threshold of Rs. 10 lakhs. The court applied the then-prevailing CBDT litigation guideline that appeals should not be filed where the tax effect is under that limit, and the appeal was dismissed solely on that ground. No other substantive issue was examined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2018 16:06:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1548 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274508</link>
      <description>An income tax appeal was not entertained because the tax effect was below the CBDT monetary threshold of Rs. 10 lakhs. The court applied the then-prevailing CBDT litigation guideline that appeals should not be filed where the tax effect is under that limit, and the appeal was dismissed solely on that ground. No other substantive issue was examined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>