<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 46 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14116</link>
    <description>The High Court clarified that the cost of acquisition for shares sold by a Hindu undivided family should not be considered nil but should be determined as the amount spent by the person who threw the asset into the common hotchpotch. The Tribunal was directed to reassess the matter in accordance with this interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:16:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 46 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14116</link>
      <description>The High Court clarified that the cost of acquisition for shares sold by a Hindu undivided family should not be considered nil but should be determined as the amount spent by the person who threw the asset into the common hotchpotch. The Tribunal was directed to reassess the matter in accordance with this interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>