<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1219 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274501</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on various tax issues, including allowing depreciation on assets leased out, treating interest expenses as revenue expenditure, and approving certain project expenses. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed as they had previously accepted similar decisions in earlier years. The Court found no substantial questions of law in these matters and directed further proceedings only on the issue of depreciation on assets leased out.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2018 13:07:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1219 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274501</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on various tax issues, including allowing depreciation on assets leased out, treating interest expenses as revenue expenditure, and approving certain project expenses. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed as they had previously accepted similar decisions in earlier years. The Court found no substantial questions of law in these matters and directed further proceedings only on the issue of depreciation on assets leased out.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>