https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274498 The High Court of Madras allowed the writ petition challenging the extension of the terminal date by the Settlement Commission. Following precedent, the court confirmed the original terminal date set by the Commission, emphasizing the finality of Commission orders and the entitlement to interest as determined by the Commission. The writ petition was granted without costs, closing the connected Miscellaneous Petition. This case underscores the importance of consistency in legal decisions, adherence to established procedures, and the binding nature of legal precedents in guiding judicial decisions. en-us Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Aug 2018 12:40:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274498 The High Court of Madras allowed the writ petition challenging the extension of the terminal date by the Settlement Commission. Following precedent, the court confirmed the original terminal date set by the Commission, emphasizing the finality of Commission orders and the entitlement to interest as determined by the Commission. The writ petition was granted without costs, closing the connected Miscellaneous Petition. This case underscores the importance of consistency in legal decisions, adherence to established procedures, and the binding nature of legal precedents in guiding judicial decisions. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274498