<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 980 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365508</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting the additions of Rs. 6 crores under Section 68 and Rs. 12 lakhs under Section 69C of the I.T. Act. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of thorough inquiries by the Revenue and criticized reliance on assumptions or unverified reports. The assessee successfully demonstrated the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions, leading to the unjustified nature of the additions being established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 12:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 980 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365508</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting the additions of Rs. 6 crores under Section 68 and Rs. 12 lakhs under Section 69C of the I.T. Act. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of thorough inquiries by the Revenue and criticized reliance on assumptions or unverified reports. The assessee successfully demonstrated the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions, leading to the unjustified nature of the additions being established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>