<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 978 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365506</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, concluding that the appellant was entitled to take Cenvat Credit on the supplementary invoices issued by Coal Companies. The decision emphasized the absence of fraud and suppression on the part of the appellant and highlighted the recurring nature of the issue. Consequently, the order under challenge was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2018 11:33:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 978 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365506</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, concluding that the appellant was entitled to take Cenvat Credit on the supplementary invoices issued by Coal Companies. The decision emphasized the absence of fraud and suppression on the part of the appellant and highlighted the recurring nature of the issue. Consequently, the order under challenge was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>