<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 967 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365495</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, granting the petitioner the liberty to seek the release of the confiscated gold upon payment of all dues, including statutory dues. The court clarified that this order did not impact the petitioner&#039;s right to pursue the appeal filed before the CESTAT against the initial confiscation order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2018 09:25:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 967 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365495</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, granting the petitioner the liberty to seek the release of the confiscated gold upon payment of all dues, including statutory dues. The court clarified that this order did not impact the petitioner&#039;s right to pursue the appeal filed before the CESTAT against the initial confiscation order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>