<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 964 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365492</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the restoration of appeals due to non-prosecution, finding the absence was not deliberate. The liability of directors for the company&#039;s actions was scrutinized, with penalties and confiscation of goods imposed on some directors but set aside for those who had resigned before the imports. The imposed penalties on the appellants were deemed unjustified and overturned, providing consequential relief. The Tribunal&#039;s decision on restoration of appeals and penalties was pronounced on 10/07/2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 964 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365492</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the restoration of appeals due to non-prosecution, finding the absence was not deliberate. The liability of directors for the company&#039;s actions was scrutinized, with penalties and confiscation of goods imposed on some directors but set aside for those who had resigned before the imports. The imposed penalties on the appellants were deemed unjustified and overturned, providing consequential relief. The Tribunal&#039;s decision on restoration of appeals and penalties was pronounced on 10/07/2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>