https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365486 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the appellant, a partnership firm, was entitled to avail cenvat credit on invoices not in their name from M/s Baheti Soya Links as the services tax was paid in the name of M/s Baheti Agro Links. Additionally, the denial of cenvat credit on telephone services due to phones being in the name of partners was overturned as the phones were used by the appellant for providing taxable services despite being registered under the partners' names. The Tribunal set aside the denial of cenvat credit on both issues, granting relief to the appellant. en-us Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Aug 2019 11:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365486 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the appellant, a partnership firm, was entitled to avail cenvat credit on invoices not in their name from M/s Baheti Soya Links as the services tax was paid in the name of M/s Baheti Agro Links. Additionally, the denial of cenvat credit on telephone services due to phones being in the name of partners was overturned as the phones were used by the appellant for providing taxable services despite being registered under the partners' names. The Tribunal set aside the denial of cenvat credit on both issues, granting relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365486